|
|
Post by Krismas on Sept 22, 2004 18:10:39 GMT -5
Don't get me wrong...I love [glow=red,2,300]SURVIVOR[/glow]......I will be glued to my TV every Thursday....but I think it would be cool to see something different in Survivor....I know they would lose their T&A factor.....but dump them in the Arctic for a season!
|
|
|
|
Post by babybear on Sept 22, 2004 18:26:31 GMT -5
i think a cold climate would be cool. couldn't be too cold though i guess cause of the dangers. who knows but it would be interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by BCandScott on Sept 24, 2004 13:04:59 GMT -5
They won't do Survivor: The Artic Circle because of the T & A factor. If there aren't women with enhanced breateses wearing tiny dirty bikinis that become frayed and threaten to expose them during challenges, most of America wouldn't watch. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by babybear on Sept 24, 2004 13:08:01 GMT -5
BC!!!!!!! you made it!!!! whoo hoo!!!!
and i agree ...... the T & A factor is a big must.
|
|
|
|
Post by BBWatchee on Sept 25, 2004 22:24:35 GMT -5
or having someone like Rich that ran naked 1/2 the time!!
|
|
|
|
Post by babybear on Sept 26, 2004 9:41:02 GMT -5
or having someone like Rich that ran naked 1/2 the time!! now that was just plain funny i have to say. he's a character. |
|
Angi
Yeah Baby
Posts: 46
|
Post by Angi on Jul 12, 2005 11:58:37 GMT -5
Actually I could do without the T&A factor, I want to see the compitions not blurred screens. I would still watch without it lol.
|
|
